KCACTF Region IV

Associate Entry Response Form

Respondent's First Name:
Respondent's Last Name:
Respondent's University/College:
Name of Production Seen:
Produced by which University/College?
What STATE is the producing school located in? *required field
Date Seen:
Playwright:
Name: Status:
Director:
Name: Status:
Scenic Designer:
Name: Status:
Costume Designer:
Name: Status:
Make-up Designer:
Name: Status:
Lighting Designer:
Name: Status:
Sound Designer:
Name: Status:
Voice/Dialect Coach: Name: Status:
Choreographer: Name: Status:
Technical Director : Name: Status:
Stage Manager: Name: Status:
Dramaturge: Name: Status:
   
YOUR Irene Ryan Scholarship Nominee:
*required
Student Design Award Nominees (OPTIONAL)
Barbizon Costume Design
Barbizon Scenic Design
Barbizon Lighting Design
Makeup Design
Sound Design
Additional Award Nominations (OPTIONAL)
Student Directing
Student Stage Manager
Student Dramaturge
Faculty Certificate of Merit Nominations (OPTIONAL)
Faculty Directing
Faculty Designer
Faculty Technologist
   
 

Was the KCACTF Sponsorship Information included in this production's program?

YOUR WRITTEN AND/OR ONLINE REPORT TO THE REGIONAL CHAIR IS NOT CONFIDENTIAL. IT WILL BE SHARED WITH THE PRODUCING SCHOOL OR DIRECTOR.

Your written report MAY:
- be a paragraph, a page, a bulleted list, an outline, or complete sentences.

Please take special note: Additional written comments are REQUIRED!
Written responses are required for ALL Associate and Participating productions in Region IV. They can be organized any way you feel comfortable, but the following prompts under each main area offer an excellent framework for a very thorough and complete response.
KCACTF production responses are NOT to be and WILL NOT be sent to anyone other than the regional vice-chair and the director of the production and are not to be duplicated, posted or used in any form without the consent of the director.

Choice of Play: Is this play appropriate for college/university production? List your criteria and explain how or if the production met this criteria.

Direction: Define the director’s concept and explain whether this was viable for the play. Was it successfully and consistently realized? How was the play cast? How did the director work with actors? Did he or she illustrate adequate control over the play, create a good stage pictures, define movement, etc.?


Acting: Address in small casts each of the actors and in large casts, the feel of the ensemble, especially looking at technical ability, interpretation of character, ensemble performance, movement, period, dialect, etc.


Design Elements: Speak about whether the design elements contributed to the production. Look for artistic excellence and how the design elements functioned within the context of the play. Were these elements on the same page as directorial concept and acting choices etc.?


Technical Elements: How were the design elements executed? How did the show run? What improvements would help the show itself?

Respondent's Email Address:
(this required field will serve as your electronic signature)